Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.38 seconds)

Delhi Jal Board vs Mahinder Singh on 1 September, 2000

5. The learned counsel for the applicant has basically relied upon decision of the Honble Supreme Court of India in Delhi Jal Board Vs. Mahinder Singh, SLP ) No. 11726 of 2000  decided on 1.9.2000 and Ramesh Kumar Vs. Union of India etc. C.A. No. 811 of 2007 decided on 31.7.2015 in which the consequential benefits of pay and allowance of retrospective promotion were allowed. The Court had held that in the absence of statutory provision, normal rule is no work no pay but in appropriate cases, a court of law may take into account all the facts in their entirety and pass and appropriate order in consonance with law. Thus, in the facts of those cases the benefit was allowed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 116 - Full Document

Ramesh Kumar vs Union Of India & Ors on 31 July, 2015

5. The learned counsel for the applicant has basically relied upon decision of the Honble Supreme Court of India in Delhi Jal Board Vs. Mahinder Singh, SLP ) No. 11726 of 2000  decided on 1.9.2000 and Ramesh Kumar Vs. Union of India etc. C.A. No. 811 of 2007 decided on 31.7.2015 in which the consequential benefits of pay and allowance of retrospective promotion were allowed. The Court had held that in the absence of statutory provision, normal rule is no work no pay but in appropriate cases, a court of law may take into account all the facts in their entirety and pass and appropriate order in consonance with law. Thus, in the facts of those cases the benefit was allowed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 79 - R Banumathi - Full Document
1