Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (1.70 seconds)

Jaipur Zila Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank ... vs Ram Gopal Sharma & Ors on 17 January, 2002

15. The question whether approval petition under Section 33 (2) (b) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 is mandatory or not for orders of dismissal pending Industrial Dispute has become a matter res judicata in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jaipur Zila Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Limited vs Ram Gopal Sharma and others reported in 2002 (2) SCC 244. In times of Industrial Disputes, advertorial actions of the employers against the employees can not be allowed with impunity and the protection provided to the workmen under Section 33 (2) (b) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 is sacrosanct and mandatory. If the employer fails to file the approval petition under Section 33 (2) (b) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 for the advertorial actions taken by them against the employees during the currency of the conciliation proceedings/pendency of dispute or fails to succeed in the petition before the Tribunal, the orders of dismissal is abinitio void and non est in the eyes of law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 1030 - S V Patil - Full Document

United India Insurance Company ... vs Secretary, Tamil Nadu Labour Welfare ... on 20 January, 2005

7. The petitioners submit that the 1st respondent Labour Court ought to have framed and decided the correct issues which arose in their cases viz “whether there was a conciliation proceedings pending at the time of the dismissal of the petitioners and the date when the conciliation proceedings actually commenced” instead of the faulty question “whether a conciliation proceedings could be said to have legally commenced, when the strike notice given by the Union to the Conciliation officer at Virudhunagar was defective” and wrongly relying on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2008 (2) LLN page 761 Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., vs. Tamil Nadu Labour Welfare Board.
Madras High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 2 - V Kanagaraj - Full Document
1