Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.51 seconds)

Avtar Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 11 November, 2011

23. Accordingly, the Hon'ble Supreme Court set aside the decisions rendered by the full bench of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in Avtar Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors. and the division bench in State of Punjab & Ors. V. Rajinder Singh while the decision of the division bench in State of Punjab & Ors. v. Rajinder Kumar was upheld, subject to the modification that the concerned employees would be entitled to the minimum of the pay-scale of the category to which they belong.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 60 - Cited by 82 - Full Document

The State Of Punjab And Others vs Rajinder Singh Etc on 7 January, 2009

23. Accordingly, the Hon'ble Supreme Court set aside the decisions rendered by the full bench of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in Avtar Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors. and the division bench in State of Punjab & Ors. V. Rajinder Singh while the decision of the division bench in State of Punjab & Ors. v. Rajinder Kumar was upheld, subject to the modification that the concerned employees would be entitled to the minimum of the pay-scale of the category to which they belong.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 5 - J Singh - Full Document

Secretary, State Of Karnataka And ... vs Umadevi And Others on 10 April, 2006

27. We choose not to entertain the relief sought for by the writ applicants seeking regularization. We could notice that the writ applicants were appointed against vacant sanctioned posts. The selection committee constituted by the state has followed procedure prescribed under resolution and therefore the appointments of contractual lecturers can at the most be treated as irregular appointments. The Learned Single Judge has relied upon the earlier order dated 24th march, 2011 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Letters Patent Appeal no. 2986 of 2010, and directed the State to look into the cases of respondents as a one time measure for absorption /regularization. The fact that there exist vacant sanctioned posts and the state has availed their services since long, we would like to remind the State, once again about the directions issued by the learned Single Judge and as well of the Division Bench of this Court. It is needless to state that such exercise may be undertaken by the State in terms of para 53 of the judgment of Hon'ble Page 53 of 54 Downloaded on : Mon Feb 20 20:37:03 IST 2023 C/LPA/1159/2017 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 14/02/2023 Supreme Court in the case of Umadevi (supra) and in the case of M.L. Kesari (supra). The civil application seeking vacating of interim relief filed by the writ applicants stands disposed of. No cost.

State Of Karnataka & Ors vs M.L. Kesari & Ors on 3 August, 2010

27. We choose not to entertain the relief sought for by the writ applicants seeking regularization. We could notice that the writ applicants were appointed against vacant sanctioned posts. The selection committee constituted by the state has followed procedure prescribed under resolution and therefore the appointments of contractual lecturers can at the most be treated as irregular appointments. The Learned Single Judge has relied upon the earlier order dated 24th march, 2011 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Letters Patent Appeal no. 2986 of 2010, and directed the State to look into the cases of respondents as a one time measure for absorption /regularization. The fact that there exist vacant sanctioned posts and the state has availed their services since long, we would like to remind the State, once again about the directions issued by the learned Single Judge and as well of the Division Bench of this Court. It is needless to state that such exercise may be undertaken by the State in terms of para 53 of the judgment of Hon'ble Page 53 of 54 Downloaded on : Mon Feb 20 20:37:03 IST 2023 C/LPA/1159/2017 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 14/02/2023 Supreme Court in the case of Umadevi (supra) and in the case of M.L. Kesari (supra). The civil application seeking vacating of interim relief filed by the writ applicants stands disposed of. No cost.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 1834 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1   2 Next