Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.22 seconds)

Sheikh Ishaque And Ors vs State Of Bihar on 10 March, 1995

The three circumstances advanced by the learned counsel are too Slender for treating them as mitigating circumstances. Even if we assume that such circumstances have any mitigative overtone they have been totally eclipsed by the other pillowing aggravative features looming large in the pizarre scenario of the crime unfurled in the evidence. Learned counsel tried repeatedly to strike a note of caution to us that the number of victims may not prejudicially influence our judicial perspective in awarding sentence of death. True, number of victims by itself is not a yardstick to discern a ease of the category described by the Constitution Bench in Bachan Singh's case (supra). Nonetheless number of victims is not altogether outside the scope of consideration and should not be marginalised in appropriate cases, (vide Sheikh Ishaque & Ors. v. State of Bihar, {1995] 3 SCC 392.) Bearing in mind the principles governing the sentencing policy, particularly the death sentence, we have considered the overall picture in this case. We have no doubt that this is one of the rarest of the rare cases not merely because of the record number of innocent human beings roasted alive by the appellants but by the inhuman manner in which they have plotted the scheme and executed it. What they needed, perhaps, was only wealth by plundering others. For that motive they designed a scheme with the highest proportion of viciousness. Carrying most inflammable liquid in a cane together with a match box they checked into a passenger bus during the dawn of the ill-dated day. None of the harmless faces of the unfortunate passengers not even those of some cute children in the bus, had deterred these appellants from incendiaring them into charred corpses in a split second. When human mind was allowed to be transformed itself into such demonic form and the planned pogrom was executed with extreme pedravity, we have no hesitation to agree with the courts below that this is one of the rarest of the rare cases in which alternative option is unquestionably foreclosed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 26 - K S Paripoornan - Full Document
1   2 Next