Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (1.86 seconds)
Dlf United Ltd. vs Union Of India on 1 October, 1996 cites

The Union Of India And Ors. vs Amin Chand on 19 May, 1982

In the aforesaid appeal, division bench of this Court relying on the earlier decision of this Court in R.F.A.408/77 titled Union of India Vs. Amin Chand and others dated 9-7-1979, R.F.A. 463/79 titled Chhajju Vs. Union of India dated 3-12-1979 fixed the market value of land at Rs.19,000.00 . The Court in the said decision also permitted enhancement of the claim in appeal by payment of deficient court fee.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Buta Singh (Dead) By L.Rs vs Union Of India on 17 April, 1995

The Division bench after considering the decisions in Harcharan Vs. State of Haryana (Supra), Bhag Singh & Others Vs. Union of Territory of Chandigarh ; and The Scheduled Caste Cooperative Land Owning Society Ltd., Bhatinda Vs. Union of India & Others as well as Buta Singh's case held that since the application under Order Vi Rule 17 Civil Procedure Code had been made before the appeals came up for hearing, the case would be covered by the observations of the Apex Court in Bhag Singh's case and Buta Singh's case would not be applicable. We are in agreement with the views expressed by the division bench of this Court in Smt Narmada Devi etc.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 46 - Full Document

Bhag Singh & Ors vs Union Territory Of Chandigarh, Through ... on 14 August, 1985

The Division bench after considering the decisions in Harcharan Vs. State of Haryana (Supra), Bhag Singh & Others Vs. Union of Territory of Chandigarh ; and The Scheduled Caste Cooperative Land Owning Society Ltd., Bhatinda Vs. Union of India & Others as well as Buta Singh's case held that since the application under Order Vi Rule 17 Civil Procedure Code had been made before the appeals came up for hearing, the case would be covered by the observations of the Apex Court in Bhag Singh's case and Buta Singh's case would not be applicable. We are in agreement with the views expressed by the division bench of this Court in Smt Narmada Devi etc.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 317 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

The Scheduled Caste Co-Operative Land ... vs Union Of India And Others on 18 September, 1990

The Division bench after considering the decisions in Harcharan Vs. State of Haryana (Supra), Bhag Singh & Others Vs. Union of Territory of Chandigarh ; and The Scheduled Caste Cooperative Land Owning Society Ltd., Bhatinda Vs. Union of India & Others as well as Buta Singh's case held that since the application under Order Vi Rule 17 Civil Procedure Code had been made before the appeals came up for hearing, the case would be covered by the observations of the Apex Court in Bhag Singh's case and Buta Singh's case would not be applicable. We are in agreement with the views expressed by the division bench of this Court in Smt Narmada Devi etc.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 89 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document
1   2 Next