Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.49 seconds)
Ashish Jain vs Shankar Lal on 12 March, 2020 cites

Harjinder Singh vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 21 December, 1984

"In Harjinder Singh's case (supra) the facts were somewhat similar to the present case. In that case, a case was fixed on the police report under Sections 302, 307, 342, 440, 149, 148 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. Another case was instituted against the said accused along with some other persons upon a private complaint. Both the cases were committed to the Court of Sessions for trial. After discussing the law and correct interpretation of Sections 210 and 223 of the Code, the Supreme Court held as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 61 - A P Sen - Full Document

Ranjit Singh Kalra & Another vs State Of Haryana & Another on 27 March, 2018

"6. As a result of the above discussion, the present petition is allowed with direction that both the cases be tried together but not consolidated i.e. evidence be recorded separately in both the cases and dispose of the same by two separate judgements while taking care that judgement in one case is not based on the evidence recorded in the other case as observed in the case of 4 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 22-03-2020 09:30:07 ::: CRM-M-28621-2015 -5- Ranjit Singh 's case (supra). The present petitioner shall complete their evidence as soon as possible preferably within three months so that the decision in the criminal case filed by the respondents herein is not held back on account of the pendency of the present case in dispute." [7]. The present case is squarely covered by the ratio of above decisions.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - R M Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next