Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.49 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 127 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
S.N. Mukherjee vs Union Of India on 28 August, 1990
8. I have considered the rival submissions made at
the Bar. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
'S.N.MUKHERJEE V. UNION OF INDIA', (1990) 4
SCC 594 has held that the Supreme Court has held
that people must have confidence in the judicial
or quasi judicial authorities. While emphasizing
the need for assigning reasons, it was held that
giving of reasons minimizes the chances of
arbitrariness and hence, it is an essential
requirement of the rule of law.
Section 126 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Sec.& Curator Victoria Memorial Hall vs Howrah Ganatantrik Nagrik Samity & Ors on 9 March, 2010
In 'SECRETARY
AND CURATOR, VICTORIA MEMORIAL HALL
V. HOWRAH GANATANTRIK NAGRIK SAMITY
6
AND OTHERS', (2010) 3 SCC 732, it has been
held by the Supreme Court that reason is the
heartbeat of every conclusion. Absence of
reasons renders the order
indefensible/unsustainable particularly when the
order is subject to further challenge before a
higher forum. It has further been held that
recording of reasons is a principle of natural
justice. It ensures transparency and fairness in
decision making. In the backdrop of aforesaid well
settled legal position, the relevant extract of the
impugned order is reproduced below which reads as
under:
The Companies Act, 1956
1