Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.39 seconds)The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 17 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977 [Entire Act]
Section 55 in Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977 [Entire Act]
Vinod Mittal & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 27 April, 2009
11. Feeling aggrieved, the HUDA by way of filing LPA, thus
challenged the said judgment passed by the learned Single Judge. The
Hon'ble LPA Bench, vide order dated 16.10.2012, allowed the appeals
filed by the HUDA and held that the lack of amenities cannot be made a
ground for not making the payment of installments and the allottees are
liable to pay simple interest on delayed payment of installments @ 18 %
per annum. However, the prayer of the HUDA to compound the interest
was rejected. The relevant paragraphs as occur in the said judgment
become extracted hereinafter.
Subhash Chander And Another vs Haryana Urban Development Authority ... on 8 December, 2008
9. The observations recorded by the Division Bench of this
court in Subhash Chander and another v. Haryana Urbhan
Development Authority and another, 2009(1) PLR 675, also
fortifies our view:
Mohan Lal Goel vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 24 August, 2015
In pursuance thereto, the allottee approached this Court by
filing CWP No. 6951 of 2014, titled as Mohan Goel vs. State of
8 of 17
::: Downloaded on - 19-03-2025 02:08:49 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:036147-DB
CWP-1202-2019 and CWP-6706-2021 -9-
Haryana and Others for directing the HUDA to consider the case of
the petitioner in terms of the judgment dated 16.10.2012 passed by this
Hon'ble Court in LPA No.933 of 2009.
1