Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.43 seconds)Abl International Ltd. & Anr vs Export Credit Guarantee Corportion Of ... on 18 December, 2003
13. There can be no dispute about the well-settled legal principle, that disputes relating to contracts cannot be agitated under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, as held by the Apex Court in ABL International Ltd. v. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. , there is no absolute bar with regard to entertaining such a writ petition in case it does not involve serious disputed questions of fact which require consideration of evidence and merely the issue relates to interpretation/meaning of documents involved.
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi Etc. Etc vs State Of U.P. And Ors on 20 September, 1990
In the above decision, while extensively referring to the ratio laid down in Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi v. State of U.P. , it was held that when an instrumentality of the State acts contrary to public good and public interest, unfairly, unjustly and unreasonably, in its contractual, constitutional or statutory obligation, it really acts contrary to the constitutional guarantee found in Article 14 of the Constitution, and in such circumstances, there should not be any inhibition to grant the relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1