Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.24 seconds)
Keherul Islam vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 19 March, 2025 cites

Sri. Dibya Jyoti Paul vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 9 April, 2021

We also find that the aforesaid order dated July 06, 2023 has been passed while relying on the common order dated April 09, 2021 passed in WPA 3780 of 2015 (Sri Dibya Jyoti Paul vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.) with WPA 3781 of 2015 (Sri Rajib Kumar Saha vs. The State of West Bengal Ors.). We have gone through the facts of cases narrated in the aforesaid orders and we are satisfied that none of the said orders enure to the benefit of the appellant - writ petitioner. The writ petitioners in all the three cases aforesaid were vigilant enough and they had approached the Court well in time, while the panel was alive. In fact the writ petitioners in all the Page 6 of 7 three cases had approached this Court earlier i.e. Sri Dibya Jyoti Paul and Sri Rajib Kumar Saha had initially filed W.P.13815 (W) of 2014 and W.P.16395 (W) of 2014 respectively and Masadul Hossain had filed W.P.32241 (W) of 2013. The orders relied on by the appellant thus came to be passed by the Court in the second round of the litigation. Contrastingly, the Appellant-writ petitioner in the instant case did nothing for several years and suddenly sprung up with the writ petition in the year 2025 that too after the panel had expired.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 4 - Cited by 3 - A Sinha - Full Document

Masadul Hossain vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 6 July, 2023

The learned Single Judge has rightly noted that "On perusal of the order passed by the coordinate bench on 6th July, 2023 in Masadul Hossain (supra), it appears that within the lifetime of the panel petitioner in that matter preferred writ petition in 2013 and in terms of the order passed in the first writ petition an order was passed on 29th October, 2013 rejecting the prayer of the petitioner namely, Masadul Hossain which triggered subsequent writ petition being WPA 27054 of 2017".
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Roy - Full Document

Rajib Kumar Sinha & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Anr on 15 November, 2017

We also find that the aforesaid order dated July 06, 2023 has been passed while relying on the common order dated April 09, 2021 passed in WPA 3780 of 2015 (Sri Dibya Jyoti Paul vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.) with WPA 3781 of 2015 (Sri Rajib Kumar Saha vs. The State of West Bengal Ors.). We have gone through the facts of cases narrated in the aforesaid orders and we are satisfied that none of the said orders enure to the benefit of the appellant - writ petitioner. The writ petitioners in all the three cases aforesaid were vigilant enough and they had approached the Court well in time, while the panel was alive. In fact the writ petitioners in all the Page 6 of 7 three cases had approached this Court earlier i.e. Sri Dibya Jyoti Paul and Sri Rajib Kumar Saha had initially filed W.P.13815 (W) of 2014 and W.P.16395 (W) of 2014 respectively and Masadul Hossain had filed W.P.32241 (W) of 2013. The orders relied on by the appellant thus came to be passed by the Court in the second round of the litigation. Contrastingly, the Appellant-writ petitioner in the instant case did nothing for several years and suddenly sprung up with the writ petition in the year 2025 that too after the panel had expired.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - D P Dey - Full Document

State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors vs Harish Chandra Singh on 17 January, 1969

a) It appears to be an admitted position that the panel of the selected candidates expired on March 24, 2015. We say admitted because the order impugned records the contention of the Respondent West Bengal Central School Service Commission to the effect that the panel expired Page 3 of 7 on March 24, 20215 and such contention has not even been feebly attempted to be rebutted by the Appellant- writ petitioner either before the learned Single Judge or before us. The writ petition came to be filed on or about January 31, 2025 i.e. almost a decade thereafter. The learned Single Judge has while relying on the judgments rendered in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Harish Chandra reported at (1996) 9 SCC 309 and Girdhar Kumar Dadhich and Anr. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. reported at (2009) 2 SCC 706 declined the writ petitioner's prayers on the ground that the writ petitioner had approached the Court after expiry of the panel. We concur with such view of the learned Single Judge.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 221 - S M Sikri - Full Document

Girdhar Kumar Dadhich & Anr vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 23 January, 2009

a) It appears to be an admitted position that the panel of the selected candidates expired on March 24, 2015. We say admitted because the order impugned records the contention of the Respondent West Bengal Central School Service Commission to the effect that the panel expired Page 3 of 7 on March 24, 20215 and such contention has not even been feebly attempted to be rebutted by the Appellant- writ petitioner either before the learned Single Judge or before us. The writ petition came to be filed on or about January 31, 2025 i.e. almost a decade thereafter. The learned Single Judge has while relying on the judgments rendered in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Harish Chandra reported at (1996) 9 SCC 309 and Girdhar Kumar Dadhich and Anr. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. reported at (2009) 2 SCC 706 declined the writ petitioner's prayers on the ground that the writ petitioner had approached the Court after expiry of the panel. We concur with such view of the learned Single Judge.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 52 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1