Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (0.43 seconds)The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015
Section 94 in The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 [Entire Act]
Arnit Das vs State Of Bihar on 9 May, 2000
14. The Apex Court in Rashipal Singh Solanki vs. State of U.P. and Others; 2021 (11) ADJ 489 decided on 18.11.2021, considered the judgments given in Parag Bhati vs. State of U.P.; (2016) 12 SCC 744, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta vs. State of U.P. and Another; (2019) 12 SCC 370 and Abuzar Hossain vs. State of West Bengal; (2012) 10 SCC 489, Ashwani Kumar Saxena vs. State of M.P.; (2012) 9 SCC 750, Babloo Pasi vs. State of Jharkhand; (2008) 13 SCC 133, Arnit Das vs. State of Bihar; (2000) 5 SCC 488, Jitendra Ram vs. State of Jharkhand; (2006) 9 SCC 428 and several others and in essence held that each case may be dealt with in the light of its own peculiar facts and circumstances while keeping certain principles as guiding factor in mind as described in concluding para of the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court.
Parag Bhati(Juvenile)Thr.Legal ... vs State Of U.P. on 12 May, 2016
14. The Apex Court in Rashipal Singh Solanki vs. State of U.P. and Others; 2021 (11) ADJ 489 decided on 18.11.2021, considered the judgments given in Parag Bhati vs. State of U.P.; (2016) 12 SCC 744, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta vs. State of U.P. and Another; (2019) 12 SCC 370 and Abuzar Hossain vs. State of West Bengal; (2012) 10 SCC 489, Ashwani Kumar Saxena vs. State of M.P.; (2012) 9 SCC 750, Babloo Pasi vs. State of Jharkhand; (2008) 13 SCC 133, Arnit Das vs. State of Bihar; (2000) 5 SCC 488, Jitendra Ram vs. State of Jharkhand; (2006) 9 SCC 428 and several others and in essence held that each case may be dealt with in the light of its own peculiar facts and circumstances while keeping certain principles as guiding factor in mind as described in concluding para of the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court.