Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 34 (1.03 seconds)Section 22 in The University Grants Commission Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The University Grants Commission Act, 1956
Section 26 in The University Grants Commission Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920
Section 3 in The University Grants Commission Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The University Grants Commission Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The University Grants Commission Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
University Of Delhi vs Raj Singh on 8 September, 1994
Thus, anything done under Section 12 is to be in consultation with
Universities. It is not the case of UGC that the directives / Guidelines on
which it relies to contend that it had prohibited deemed Universities from
commencing new course / programme or from establishing new department
were issued in consultation with deemed Universities. On the contrary, it
has come on record that the deemed Universities were protesting
thereagainst. The said Guidelines / directives thus cannot be held to be in
accordance with Section 12 and thus are of no avail. We also find Supreme
Court in University of Delhi supra to have also observed that the regulation
making power of the UGC can in fact be traced to Section 12(1)(j) of the
Act.
Ptc India Ltd vs Central Electricity Reg. Comm. ... on 15 March, 2010
32. The principle which immediately gets attracted in this respect is, that
ordinarily what is statutorily prescribed to be done by making Regulations
and which Regulations are required to be laid before each House of
Parliament while in session for a period of 30 days, cannot be done
otherwise. Else, there would be no sense left in prescribing the same to be
done by Regulation. Thus, once we hold that the UGC, by Regulation, can
require the Universities or deemed Universities to obtain prior approval
before commencing a new course/programme, ordinarily UGC would not be
entitled to insist so without framing a regulation. Supreme Court in PTC
India Ltd. Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (2010) 4 SCC
603 held that if a different rate is required to be prescribed under the
Electricity Act, 2003 by Regulations framed under Section 178 of the Act, it
could be done only by subordinate legislation.