Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.86 seconds)

Cidco vs Vasudha Gorakhnath Mandevlekar on 15 May, 2009

11. A reading of paras 167 to 170 of the decision in Jigya Yadav reveals that cases in which the correction is sought on the basis of the Signature Not Verified WP(C) 5961/2023 Page 8 of 10 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJIT Digitally Signed KUMAR By:CHANDRASHEKHARAN HARI SHANKAR Signing Date:02.05.2024 Signing Date:02.05.2024 15:08:19 15:06:06 details entered in public records have been regarded as being on a different footing, inasmuch as Section 67 read with Sections 79 and 80 of the Evidence Act, 1872 extends a legal presumption of validity to public records. The Supreme Court has also relied, in this context, in its earlier decision in CIDCO v. Vasudha Gorakhnath Mandevlekar4.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 96 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Jigya Yadav Thru Her Father vs C.B.S.E. (Central Board Of Secondary ... on 3 June, 2021

194.2. However, in the latter situation where the change is to be effected on the basis of new acquired name without any supporting school record or public document, that request may be entertained upon insisting for prior permission/declaration by a court of law in that regard and publication in the Official Gazette including surrender/return of original certificate (or duplicate original certificate, as the case may be) issued by CBSE and upon payment of prescribed fees. The fresh certificate as in other situations referred to above, retain the original entry (except in respect of change of name effected in exercise of right to be forgotten) and to insert caption/annotation indicating the date on which it has been recorded and other details including disclaimer of CBSE. This is so because the CBSE is not required to adjudicate nor has the mechanism to verify the correctness of the claim of the applicant."
Supreme Court of India Cites 53 - Cited by 204 - A M Khanwilkar - Full Document
1