cites: 152225542

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur And Ors. on 30 June, 2020

Now since it is the settled position of law in view of the full Bench decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur & Ors. (supra) the claimants in the present case are also entitled for similar compensation.

Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 1453 - I Malhotra - Full Document

Sebastiani Lakra vs National Insurance Company Ltd. on 12 October, 2018

16. The claimants are entitled for compensation under the conventional heads i.e. funeral expenses, loss of consortium and loss of estate at the reasonable 1 (2009) 6 SCC 121 12 amount of Rs.70,000/- as held in National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi 2 and others and in Sebastiani Lakra and Others Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and another 3.

Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 332 - D Gupta - Full Document

Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram on 18 September, 2018

In the recent decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur & Ors. (supra) the Hon'ble Apex Court relying on Pranay Sethi (supra) and Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. (Supra) awarded the compensation under conventional head at Rs.70,000/- i.e towards loss of estate at Rs.15,000/-, funeral expenses Rs.15,000/-. spousal consortium at Rs.40,000/- and parental consortium to the children at Rs.40,000/- each. Therefore, the contention of the learned Advocate for the insurer that the amount of compensation under the head consortium should be 15 restricted to Rs.40,000/- only, do not hold good.

Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 4992 - I Malhotra - Full Document

Lakshman And Ors. vs Susheela Chand Choudary And Ors. on 31 January, 1996

Pradeep Kumar, 2014 (3) UC 1687 and Karnataka 14 High Court in Lakshman v. Susheela Chand Choudhary, 1996 ACJ 1265 (Karnataka). However, there was no clarity with respect to the principles on which compensation could be awarded on loss of filial consortium.

Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 40 - A M Farooq - Full Document

Section 187 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 2368

Section 134 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 1445

Section 279 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 65927

Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 68489

Section 337 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 41816

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi Son Of Late Prashant Sethi ... on 20 April, 2011

In the recent decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur & Ors. (supra) the Hon'ble Apex Court relying on Pranay Sethi (supra) and Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. (Supra) awarded the compensation under conventional head at Rs.70,000/- i.e towards loss of estate at Rs.15,000/-, funeral expenses Rs.15,000/-. spousal consortium at Rs.40,000/- and parental consortium to the children at Rs.40,000/- each. Therefore, the contention of the learned Advocate for the insurer that the amount of compensation under the head consortium should be 15 restricted to Rs.40,000/- only, do not hold good.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 10133 - K Kannan - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results