Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.20 seconds)State Of Haryana vs Chandra Mani & Ors on 30 January, 1996
4 It has been further contended that the appellants, after obtaining
necessary documents and information with respect to the case, some
delay was occurred due to fulfillment of various departmental
formalities and working of the State machinery, hence, at times the
fulfillment of departmental formalities takes unexpected long time.
Therefore, in some cases the appellants/State is prevented from filing
the case within the prescribed period of limitation, which is bona fide
and not deliberate. The instant appeal is, therefore, being filed after a
delay of 59 days from the prescribed period of limitation. Reliance has
been placed upon the judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in
the matter of "State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani and others" (1996)
3 SCC 132 to buttress his submissions.
Union Of India vs Tarsem Singh on 19 September, 2019
7 The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of "Union of India and
others v. Tarsem Singh" (2008) 8 SCC 652 summarized the settled
principles in the following manner:-
Thressiamma Jacob Etc. Etc. vs Geologist, Dptt.Of Mining And Geology ... on 20 April, 2015
9 In the light of the principles of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the aforementioned judgments (supra), and upon due
consideration of the grounds urged in the application for condonation of
delay, we find that the delay of 59 days in preferring the writ appeal has
not been satisfactorily explained with any cogent or plausible reason.
The appellants have failed to demonstrate sufficient cause so as to
justify condonation of such delay. Therefore, no ground is made out to
exercise our discretion in favour of the appellants for condoning the
delay.
1