Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.28 seconds)

Central Bureau Of Investigation vs R.S. Pai And Another on 3 April, 2002

The underlined portion "shall", as a matter of fact, mandates an Investigating Officer to place the additional material / evidence before the Court. It may be noted that in the judgment referred to by the learned counsel for the petitioner in Central Bureau of Investigation v. R.S. Pai's case (cited supra), the Supreme Court while holding that "shall" occurring in Section 173(8) cannot be interpreted as mandatory, on the other hand, preserved the right under Section 173(8) and held that the word "shall" in the context of the duty of the Investigating Officer has to be viewed as mandatory, in the interests of justice.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 104 - Full Document
1   2 Next