Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.47 seconds)
Shaik Shafi Ahamed vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Orther on 31 January, 2024 cites

V. Jagannadha Rao & Ors vs State Of A.P. & Ors on 7 November, 2001

49. W.P.(TR).No.6009 of 2017 has been filed to declare that the appointment of Junior Lecturers working in the Government Junior Colleges by transfer is violative of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of V.Jagannadha Rao and others Vs. State of A.P 4 and not to fill up the post held by the petitioner in S.R. Government Arts & Science College, Kothagudem and also to renew the appointment of the petitioner as contract Lecturer for the academic year 2016-2017. Admittedly, the Junior Lecturers working in the Government Junior Colleges have not been transferred and filled the post held by the petitioner herein. In fact, Smt. T.Aruna Kumari, who was working in the Government Degree College, Khammam has been transferred and posted in S.R. Govt. Degree College (Arts & Science college), Kothagudem in the place of the petitioner 4 AIR 2002 SC 77 24 herein. Further, petitioner filed another W.P.No.34312 of 2016 to renew his services. It is also represented that petitioner's services were renewed for the year 2016-17 and therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 55 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Secretary, State Of Karnataka And ... vs Umadevi And Others on 10 April, 2006

47. The Hon'ble Apex Court in Nihal Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others 2 had observed that the dicta laid down in Secretary, State of Karnataka and Ors. V. Umadevi and Others 3 cannot become a license for exploitation by the State and its instrumentalities by claiming that the appointments made by them are of temporary in nature, when there is need for creation of posts. The Hon'ble Apex Court also observed that the failure of the executive government to apply its mind and take a decision to create posts or stop extracting work from persons, such as the appellants therein for decades together itself would be an arbitrary action on the part of the State.
Supreme Court of India Cites 46 - Cited by 4959 - P K Balasubramanyan - Full Document
1