Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.32 seconds)Section 383 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 282 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
The Indian Succession Act, 1925
Section 340 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
George Anthony Harris vs Millicent Spencer on 11 August, 1932
In this regard reliance can be placed on a judgment in case
titled as George Anthony Harris Vs. Millicent Spencer reported as AIR
1933 Bombay 370. In the said case it was held that a person applying
for revocation for the grant must show that he has an interest in the
alleged Will i.e. in the estate of the deceased disposed of by the
alleged Will. There must be some interest and even the slightest
interest is sufficient to apply for revocation.
Section 276 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 222 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Sadananda Pyne vs Harinam Sha And Anr. on 16 September, 1949
15. The Division Bench of Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta in
case Sadanand Pyne Vs. Harinam Sha and Anr. reported as AIR 1950
Calcutta 179 has observed that in order to have the locus standi to
apply for revocation of the probate, a person must have an interest in
the estate of the deceased presuming he had died intestate.
N. Natarajan vs B.K.Subba Rao on 3 December, 2002
In support of his submission he
has relied upon a Judgment in case titled as N. Natrajan Vs. B.K.
Subbarao reported as AIR 2003 Supreme Court 541. I have carefully
gone through the said Judgment. The same is not applicable to the
facts of this case. In the said case it was held that complaint under
Section 340 Cr.P.C. in respect of offences affecting administration of
justice can be lodged even by a stranger to the proceedings.