Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.32 seconds)
Mahender vs Election Commission Of India And Others on 3 May, 2019 cites

Pashupati Nath Singh vs Harihar Prasad Singh on 22 January, 1968

9. Thus, the law is well settled that once the election process has commenced the High Court should restrain itself from exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution and should permit an aggrieved candidate to get his grievance redressed through an election petition only. Judgment in Pashupati Nath Singh's case (supra) relied upon by the petitioner is distinguishable because the said judgment has been passed after the election was challenged through an election petition.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 20 - S M Sikri - Full Document

N.P. Ponnuswami vs Returning Officer, Namakkal ... on 21 January, 1952

3. Mr. Namit Kumar, Advocate, Standing Counsel for the Election Commission of India is present in Court. He submits that an advance copy of the petition has been received by him and that the last date for scrutiny of nomination forms i.e. 24.4.2019 has long gone past. At this stage, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. That apart, Article 329 (b) of the Constitution of India bars interference in the election process, at this stage. Also, wrongful rejection of a nomination paper is a valid ground for challenging an election by way of election petition and thus, the petitioner has remedy of filing an election petition after the 2 of 7 ::: Downloaded on - 09-06-2019 03:01:20 ::: CWP-11665-2019 3 election process is over. Thus, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. He places reliance upon 'N.P. Ponnuswami Vs. The Returning Officer, Namakhal Constituency, Namakkal, Sale Distt.
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 830 - Full Document
1   2 Next