Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.43 seconds)Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd vs M/S. Aksh Optifibre Ltd. & Anr on 12 August, 2005
4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would
contend that the requirement of obtaining prior approval is not
mandatory but only directory. We are unable to accept the aforesaid
submission. The Hon'ble Supreme Court quoting “Craies on Statute
Law” in the decision reported in (2005) 7 SCC 234 (Shin-Etsu
Chemical Co.Ltd vs. Aksh Optifibre Ltd) held that if the
requirements of a statute which prescribes the manner in which
something is to be done are expressed in negative language, then those
requirements are in all cases absolute, and that neglect to attend to
them will invalidate the whole proceeding.
State Of Up & Ors vs Harish Chandra & Ors on 12 April, 1996
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the decision
reported in (1996) 9 SCC 309 (State of U. P. and others vs. Harish
Chandra and others) held as follows :
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971
1