Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.18 seconds)
Uma Shanker Bharti vs Delhi Development Authority on 4 July, 2023 cites

State Of Haryana And Ors. Etc. Etc vs Piara Singh And Ors. Etc. Etc on 12 August, 1992

24. We have also carefully gone through the judgments being relied upon by the learned counsel in support of their respective arguments. We have no doubt in our mind that the adjudication of the present issue would rest on the facts of the case rather than any law laid down. Moreover, the support drawn by the applicants from the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment in Piara Singh (supra) quoted in one of the preceding paragraphs, would not be applicable in the present circumstances as the present applicants have not been appointed on any particular post but merely engaged for a limited period i.e. six months initially and for some specific tasks.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 1473 - B P Reddy - Full Document

Harsh Ajay Singh vs Union Of India on 19 July, 2022

15. In the instant case, initially the DDA had framed its own policies and guidelines but in the year 2018 when the Govt. of India framed uniform guidelines with respect to the engagement of Consultant/Advisers containing terms 8 O.A. No. 1695/2022 and conditions of Consultants etc., DDA, being a government organisation, too adopted those uniform guidelines. The policy of 05.12.2018 which is under challenge in the present OA has been adopted on the basis of the uniform policy notified. He also draws a parallel from the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Harsh Ajay Singh Vs. Union of India in W.P. (C) No. 457/2022.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1