Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.24 seconds)Tahsildar Singh And Another vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 5 May, 1959
11. Merely because a statement is recorded by a police
personnel and the thumb impression of the deceased was
affixed it cannot straightaway be rejected. (See State of
Rajasthan v. Teja Ram (1999 (3) SCC 507), Rajik Ram v.
Jaswant Singh Chauhan (AIR 1975 SC 667) and famous
Tahsildar's case, Tahsildar Singh v. State of U.P. (AIR 1959 SC
1012)
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 324 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 326 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
State Of Rajasthan vs Teja Ram And Ors on 19 March, 1999
11. Merely because a statement is recorded by a police
personnel and the thumb impression of the deceased was
affixed it cannot straightaway be rejected. (See State of
Rajasthan v. Teja Ram (1999 (3) SCC 507), Rajik Ram v.
Jaswant Singh Chauhan (AIR 1975 SC 667) and famous
Tahsildar's case, Tahsildar Singh v. State of U.P. (AIR 1959 SC
1012)