Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)
) Whether vs Pushpa Rana Wherein In The Hon'Ble High ... on 31 August, 2015 cites

Smt. Kaushnuma Begum And Ors vs The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. And Ors on 3 January, 2001

Further, in Kaushnumma Begum and others v/s New India Assurance Company Limited, 2001 ACJ 421 SC, the issue of wrongful act or omission on the part of driver of the motor vehicle involved in the accident has been left to a secondary importance and it was held that, mere use or involvement of motor vehicle in causing bodily injuries or death to a human being or damage to property would made the petition maintainable under section 166 and 140 of the Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 2652 - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd. vs Smt. Pushpa Rana And Ors. on 20 December, 2007

To determine the negligence, I am being guided by the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in 2009 ACJ 287, National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pushpa Rana wherein in the Hon'ble High Court held that in case the petitioner files the certified copy of the criminal record Kiran Bansal P.O­MACT (North­East) DAR No.219/09 Page 3/9 or the criminal record showing the completion of the investigation by the police or the issuance of charge sheet under section 279/304 A IPC or the certified copy of the FIR or in addition the recovery memo and the mechanical inspection report of the offending vehicle, these documents are sufficient proof to reach to the conclusion that the driver was negligent. It was further held that the proceedings under the Motor Vehicles Act are not akin to the proceedings in a civil suit and hence strict rules of evidence are not required to be followed in this regard.
Delhi High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 4796 - K Gambhir - Full Document
1