Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.24 seconds)
Shri. R. Sundararajan vs Smt. Alamelamma on 3 August, 2022 cites

Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma & Ors on 15 May, 2018

I find it necessary to say that the issue is no longer res-integra. The law in this regard is also recently well 14 settled by the Apex court in VINEETA SHARMA's case. The law has not been altered. Therefore, I have no hesitation in concluding that the first respondent being the objector has failed to establish that the she is having undivided interest in the property. The contention of the appellant that the first respondent has no right is to be accepted.
Delhi High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 353 - P M Singh - Full Document

Motilal Daulatram Bora & Ors vs Murlidhar Ramchandra Bhutabe[Since ... on 16 April, 1996

Suffice it to note that the Apex Court in NADAKERAPPA (SINCE DECEASED) BY LRS. AND OTHERS VS. PILLAMMA (SINCE DECEASED) BY LRS. AND OTHERS reported in AIR 2022 SC 1609 has held that an order of remand cannot be passed for the mere 18 purpose of remanding a preceding to the Trial Court or to the Tribunal. An endeavor has to be made by the Appellate Court to dispose of the case on merits. It is also held that where both the sides have led oral and documentary evidence, the Appellate Court has to decide the appeal on merits instead of remanding the case to the Trial Court or to the Tribunal.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 13 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

M.S. Khalid And Anr. vs K.R. Rangaswamy And Anr. on 17 January, 2003

Suffice it to note that the appellant being the plaintiff filed a suit on the file of Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Anekal in O.S.No.1993/2006 (Old Case No. O.S.No.18/2006) against one Mr.D.H.Britto, Mrs.Renuka Britto, K.V.Venkataramaiah, K.V.Narendra Babu and H.Nagaraj seeking the relief of cancellation of sale deeds and possession. The suit came to be dismissed by the Trial Court vide Judgment and Decree dated:28.08.2010. The appellant preferred an appeal in R.A.No.296/2010 and the Appellate Court decreed the suit holding that sale deed dated:13.12.2004 registered as document No.19788/2004-05 and 19789/2004-05 in the office of the 10 Sub-Registrar, Anekal executed by D.H.Britto in favor of Venkataramaiah are cancelled and also directed the third and the fourth defendant to hand over possession of the suit property vide Judgment and Decree dated:19.03.2011. It is noticed that D.H.Britto and Mrs.Renuka Britto preferred an appeal before this Court in R.S.A No.1643/2011 and this Court on 24.05.2012 dismissed the appeal.
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 5 - D V Kumar - Full Document
1