Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.87 seconds)
M.Jothi vs The Cantonment Board on 18 November, 2016 cites

Sunil Kumar Kori & Anr vs Gopal Das Kabra & Ors.Etc on 27 September, 2016

11. Taking note of the ratio laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court in the above decisions in Sunil Kumar Kori & another vs. Gopal Das Kabra & Others [2016 SCC OnLine SC 993] and Manohar Lal vs. Ugrasen [(2010) 11 SCC 557], and having regard to the above facts, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 10 - L N Rao - Full Document

Ramjas Foundation And Ors vs U.O.I. And Ors on 13 November, 1992

48. The present appellants had also not disclosed that land allotted to them falls in commercial area. When a person approaches a court of equity in exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution, he should approach the court not only with clean hands but also with clean mind, clean heart and clean objective. Equally, the judicial process should never become an instrument of oppression or abuse or a means in the process of the court to subvert justice. Who seeks equity must do equity. The legal maxim Jure naturae aequum est neminem cum alterius detrimento et injuria fieri locupletiorem, means that it is a law of nature that one should not be enriched by the loss or injury to another. (Vide Ramjas Foundation v. Union of India [1993 Supp (2) SCC 20 : AIR 1993 SC 852] , K.R. Srinivas v. R.M. Premchand [(1994) 6 SCC 620] and Noorduddin v. Dr. K.L. Anand [(1995) 1 SCC 242] at SCC p. 249, para 9.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 196 - Full Document

K.R.Shinivas vs R.M. Premchand on 30 September, 1994

48. The present appellants had also not disclosed that land allotted to them falls in commercial area. When a person approaches a court of equity in exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution, he should approach the court not only with clean hands but also with clean mind, clean heart and clean objective. Equally, the judicial process should never become an instrument of oppression or abuse or a means in the process of the court to subvert justice. Who seeks equity must do equity. The legal maxim Jure naturae aequum est neminem cum alterius detrimento et injuria fieri locupletiorem, means that it is a law of nature that one should not be enriched by the loss or injury to another. (Vide Ramjas Foundation v. Union of India [1993 Supp (2) SCC 20 : AIR 1993 SC 852] , K.R. Srinivas v. R.M. Premchand [(1994) 6 SCC 620] and Noorduddin v. Dr. K.L. Anand [(1995) 1 SCC 242] at SCC p. 249, para 9.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 166 - M M Punchhi - Full Document

Noorduddin vs Dr. K.L. Anand on 6 October, 1994

48. The present appellants had also not disclosed that land allotted to them falls in commercial area. When a person approaches a court of equity in exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution, he should approach the court not only with clean hands but also with clean mind, clean heart and clean objective. Equally, the judicial process should never become an instrument of oppression or abuse or a means in the process of the court to subvert justice. Who seeks equity must do equity. The legal maxim Jure naturae aequum est neminem cum alterius detrimento et injuria fieri locupletiorem, means that it is a law of nature that one should not be enriched by the loss or injury to another. (Vide Ramjas Foundation v. Union of India [1993 Supp (2) SCC 20 : AIR 1993 SC 852] , K.R. Srinivas v. R.M. Premchand [(1994) 6 SCC 620] and Noorduddin v. Dr. K.L. Anand [(1995) 1 SCC 242] at SCC p. 249, para 9.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 149 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document
1