Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 37 (0.41 seconds)Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 362 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 147 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Makkapati Nagaswara Sastri vs S.S. Satyanarayan on 18 September, 1980
such order for the reason that in such an eventuality the
order becomes a nullity and the provisions of Section
362 Cr.P.C. would not operate. In such eventuality, the
judgment is manifestly contrary to the audi alteram partem
rule of natural justice. The power of recall is different from
the power of altering/reviewing the judgment. However, the
party seeking recall/alteration has to establish that it was
not at fault. (Vide: Chitawan & Ors. v. Mahboob Ilahi,
Deepak Thanwardas Balwani v. State of Maharashtra &
Anr. Swarth Mahto An&r. v. Dharmdeo Narain Singh,
Makkapati Nagaswara Sastri v. S.S. Satyanarayan, Asit
Kumar Kar v. State of West Bengal & Ors., Vishnu Agarwal
v. State of U.P. & Anr.
Asit Kumar Kar vs State Of West Bengal & Ors on 21 January, 2009
such order for the reason that in such an eventuality the
order becomes a nullity and the provisions of Section
362 Cr.P.C. would not operate. In such eventuality, the
judgment is manifestly contrary to the audi alteram partem
rule of natural justice. The power of recall is different from
the power of altering/reviewing the judgment. However, the
party seeking recall/alteration has to establish that it was
not at fault. (Vide: Chitawan & Ors. v. Mahboob Ilahi,
Deepak Thanwardas Balwani v. State of Maharashtra &
Anr. Swarth Mahto An&r. v. Dharmdeo Narain Singh,
Makkapati Nagaswara Sastri v. S.S. Satyanarayan, Asit
Kumar Kar v. State of West Bengal & Ors., Vishnu Agarwal
v. State of U.P. & Anr.