Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.51 seconds)Section 504 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Raghunath Laxman Wani And Ors vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 6 August, 1971
In a case Purshottam Chopra and another Vs.
State (Government of NCT of Delhi) reported in
(2020) 11 SCC page 489, by referring the principles
laid down by the Supreme Court in a case of Laxman
Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (2002) 6 SCC 710
relating to admission and acceptability of the statement
made by a victim representing the cause of death,
usually referred to as a dying declaration. Summarized
::: Uploaded on - 29/07/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 30/07/2021 03:11:39 :::
17 CRI APPEAL 88.2021.odt
principles relating to recording of the dying declaration
and its admissibility and reliability in paragraph no.21
of the judgment is as follows :-
Purshottam Chopra vs State(Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 7 January, 2020
In view of the above discussion and applying the
relevant principles as laid down by the Supreme Court
in the case of Purushottam Chopra and another Vs.
State (Government of NCT of Delhi) (supra) to the facts
of the present case, we have not an iota of doubt that
the appellant has been rightly convicted by the trial
Court. Accordingly, we pass the following order.
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Amarsingh Munnasingh Suryawanshi vs State Of Maharashtra on 27 September, 2007
xiii. Amarsingh Munnasingh Suryawanshi Vs. State
of Maharashtra reported in 2008 AIR (SC) 479.
Ramprasad vs State Of Maharashtra on 12 May, 1999
ii. Ramprasad Vs. State of Maharashtra reported
in 1999 AIR SCW 1657.
State Of Punjab vs Parveen Kumar on 18 November, 2004
vi. State of Punjab Vs. Parveen Kumar reported in
2004 AIR SCW 6897.
P. Mani vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 24 February, 2006
vii. P. Mani Vs. State of Tamilnadu reported in
(2006) 3 SCC 161.