Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 35 (0.23 seconds)
Lalasaheb S/O Rajesaheb Shaikh And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 21 March, 2017
cites
Section 154 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 409 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Upkar Singh vs Ved Prakash & Ors on 10 September, 2004
In Amitbhai Shah Vs. CBI, reported in (2013) Cri.L.J. 2313, it
has been reiterated that second FIR, if in the nature of cross complaint
or counter complaint is permissible, which is an exception carved out in
Upkar Singh's case (supra) to the effect that, when the second FIR
consists of alleged offences which are in the nature of cross-case/cross-
complaint or counter-complaint, such cross-complaint would be
permitted as a FIR.
Amitbhai Anilchandra Shah vs Cbi & Anr on 8 April, 2013
In Amitbhai Shah Vs. CBI, reported in (2013) Cri.L.J. 2313, it
has been reiterated that second FIR, if in the nature of cross complaint
or counter complaint is permissible, which is an exception carved out in
Upkar Singh's case (supra) to the effect that, when the second FIR
consists of alleged offences which are in the nature of cross-case/cross-
complaint or counter-complaint, such cross-complaint would be
permitted as a FIR.
T.T.Antony vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 12 July, 2001
In the matter of T.T. Antony vs. State of Kerala and others,
reported in (2001)6 SCC 181, the Honourable Apex Court, in
paragraph No. 27 has observed as under :-
Nirmal Singh Kahlon vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 22 October, 2008
In the case of Nirmal
Singh Kahlon Vs. State of Punjab and ors. 1 Their Lordship's of Supreme
Court discussed the concept of fair trial and fair investigation and in
para 27 observed as under: