Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.66 seconds)

State Of Chhattisgarh vs Mohan Nageshiya, 6 Cra/969/2014 ... on 19 May, 2020

6. The remaining two witnesses i.e. PW-1 Ct. Lakhan Singh and PW2 ASI Manoj Kumar were duly examined in the court by Prosecution. No other witness has been cited or examined by Prosecution in this matter. The testimonies of PW1 and PW2 are not being discussed here in detail as they are similar and mostly in tandem with the facts of the prosecution case already mentioned above. During the testimonies of the said two State v. Praveen Kumar FIR No.54/2020 PS Lajpat Nagar page no. 3 of 18 witnesses, following documents were relied upon and exhibited by the prosecution:-
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 14 - P K Mishra - Full Document

N.K.Bajpai vs Union Of India & Anr on 15 March, 2012

In fact, the Supreme Court in N.K. Bajpai Vs. Union of India (2012) 4 SCC 653 has held that imposition of restrictions is a concept inbuilt into the enjoyment of Fundamental State v. Praveen Kumar FIR No.54/2020 PS Lajpat Nagar page no. 10 of 18 Rights, as no right can exist without a corresponding reasonable restriction placed on it. It was also held that with the development of law, Courts are expected to consider, in contradistinction to private and public interest, the institutional interest and expectations of the public at large from an institution and that balancing tests have to be applied by Courts in the process of interpretation or examining of the constitutional validity of a provision.
Supreme Court of India Cites 55 - Cited by 89 - S Kumar - Full Document

Anvar P.V vs P.K.Basheer & Ors on 18 September, 2014

16. A technical aspect which also needs to be dealt with here is that the digital evidence brought on record, i.e. photographs of the spot, have not been supported by a valid certificate u/s 65B of the Indian Evidence Act. The essentials of the certificate u/s 65B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, have been enlisted in the leading judgment of Anvar P.V. vs. P.K. Basheer & Ors. [(2014) 10 S.C.C. 473] by Hon'ble Apex Court of India as follows:
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 1156 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next