Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.31 seconds)
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.Through Its ... vs M/S. Shree Ganesh Petroleum ... on 1 February, 2022
cites
The Explosives Act, 1884
Rahul Yadav & Anr vs M/S. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Ors on 1 July, 2015
In Rahul Yadav v. Indian Oil Corporation (supra), this Court
held:-
Psa Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd. vs The Board Of Trustees Of V.O. ... on 28 July, 2021
In PSA SICAL Terminals Pvt. Ltd. (supra) this Court referred
to and relied upon the earlier judgment of this Court in MD. Army
4 .
Satyanarayana Construction Company vs Union Of India . on 27 February, 2014
In Satyanarayana Construction Company v. Union of India
and Others6, a Bench of this Court of coordinate strength held that
once a rate had been fixed in a contract, it was not open to the
Arbitrator to rewrite the terms of the contract and award a higher rate.
Central Inland Water ... vs Brojo Nath Ganguly & Anr on 6 April, 1986
In Brojo Nath Ganguly (supra), this Court held that a term in a
contract of employment as also service rules of a Government
company providing for termination of services of permanent
employees without assigning reasons, on three months’ notice, or pay
in lieu thereof was unconscionable, arbitrary and opposed to public
policy. This Court was not concerned with any lease agreement or any
dealership agreement in the aforesaid case.
The Petroleum Act, 1934
Section 5 in The Explosives Act, 1884 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority on 25 November, 2014
Furthermore, in Associate
Builders (supra) the jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal to adjudicate a
dispute itself was not in issue. The Court was dealing with the
circumstances in which a Court could look into the merits of an award.