Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.54 seconds)

Dharmendra Singh Tomar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 March, 2017

In the HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C. No.15977-2018 (Dharmendra Singh Tomar VS. State of M.P.) 3 present case, the fact of the matter is that concerned Magistrate has only noted a fact that neither any unknown person is to be identified nor any such investigation is to be carried out which Court cannot inquire on its own, and therefore, there was no need to direct investigation in the hands of the police authorities.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Smt. Hema Pathak Wife Of Sri Girja ... vs State Of U.P. And Mukul Pathak Son Of Late ... on 1 December, 2006

Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. provides that any Magistrate empowered under Section 190 may order such an investigation as can be carried out by police officer. The fact of the matter is that order of rejection of application under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. for registration and investigation of the case does not operate as res judicata and filing of a complaint is not barred as has been held in the case of Smt. Hema Pathak Vs. State of U.P., 2007 Cr.L.J. (NOC) 132.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 9 - V Prasad - Full Document
1   2 Next