Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.19 seconds)
Directorate General Of Foreign Trade vs M/S Masumi Overseas Pvt Ltd on 2 September, 2015 cites

Ganesh Trading Co vs Moji Ram on 25 January, 1978

19. In the context of amendments of pleadings in a suit the legal position is well settled. Amendments which seek to add entirely new cause of actions which virtually amount to substitution of a new plaint or a new cause of action in place of what was originally there, would normally be refused by a Court. Reference in this context may be had to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Ganesh Trading Co. Vs. Moji Ram, AIR 1978 SC 484 where the Supreme Court in paragraph 5 held as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 329 - M H Beg - Full Document

Puran Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 18 January, 1996

"9. We have not been able to appreciate the anxiety on the part of the different courts in judgments referred to above to apply the provisions of the Code to Writ Proceedings on the basis of Section 141 of the Code. When the Constitution has vested extraordinary power in the High Court under Articles 226 and 227 to issue any order, writ or direction and the power of superintendence over all courts and tribunals throughout the territories in relation to which such High Court is exercising jurisdiction, the procedure for exercising such power and jurisdiction, have to be traced and found in Articles 226 and 227 itself. No LPA 553/2015 Page 9 of 11 useful purpose will be served by limiting the power of the High Court by procedural provisions prescribed in the Code. Of course, on many questions, the provisions and procedures prescribed under the Code can be taken up as guide while exercising the power, for granting relief to persons, who have invoked the jurisdiction of the High Court. It need not be impressed that different provisions and procedures under the Code are based on well recognised principles for exercise of discretionary power, and they are reasonable and rational. But at the same time, it cannot be disputed that many procedures prescribed in the said Code are responsible for delaying the delivery of justice and causing delay in securing the remedy available to a person who pursues such remedies. The High Court should be left to adopt its own procedure for granting relief to the persons concerned. The High Court is expected to adopt a procedure which can be held to be not only reasonable but also expeditious."
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 43 - N P Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next