Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.30 seconds)Section 110A in Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 [Entire Act]
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939
The Amending Act, 1897
Section 95 in Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 [Entire Act]
Yashwant Raj vs Mohan Lal And Ors. on 30 March, 1983
In Hari Industries v. Roshan Lal Kothari 1987 ACJ 20 (Rajasthan), the learned single Judge of Rajasthan High Court has, vide para 3, assigned reasons for not following the view taken in Yaswant Raj's case, 1985 ACJ 23 (Rajasthan), stating that Yaswant Raj's case has lost all its importance on account of amendment having been made in Sections 110 and 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.
R.C. Mathew vs K.M. Jose And Ors. on 12 August, 1981
18. The Division Bench of Kerala High Court in R.C. Mathew v. KM. Jose 1982 ACJ (Supp) 33 Kerala, vide para 8 made it very clear that the subsequent introduction of Clause (aa) which specifically provides for application for compensation by owner of the property damaged in an accident is only-by way of an abundant caution and even if the amendment would not have been made, the position would have remained the same, i.e., with the amendment in Section 110 as made by Act No. 56 of 1969, adjudication of claims for compensation for damages to property of a third party was also brought within the jurisdiction of the Claims Tribunal. We find ourselves in respectful agreement with the view taken by the Division Bench of the Kerala High Court.