Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.46 seconds)

State Of J.& K. & Anr vs Ajay Dogra on 7 April, 2011

-   B,   in   any   of   the   languages   included   in  the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution of  India   or   in   English".   This   note   now   makes  Page 20 of 34 HC-NIC Page 20 of 34 Created On Fri Jun 09 00:16:32 IST 2017 C/SCA/19454/2016                                                                                                 CAV JUDGMENT it   clear   that   candidate   can   select   any   of  the   subject   as   listed   in   the   same   clause  and can answer question paper in any of the  language which is listed in 8th  schedule of  the   constitution   which   certainly   includes  Gujarati   as   one   of   the   language   and,  therefore,  if at any  point  of time,  it is  disclosed   by   the   Respondent   No.2   that  answer   to   the   paper   of   Geology   should   be  written   in   English   only,   it   amounts   to  selectiveness   and   arbitrariness.   It   is  surprising   to   note   that   though   UPSC   is  permitting to answer the question paper in  any   language   from   Schedule   8   of  Constitution,   the   GPSC   wants   that  particular   paper   should   be   answered   in  English only.   It seems that GPSC does not  have   facility   to   verify   the   answer   sheets  in   Gujarati   or   they   are   promoting   /  supporting  the examiner  who is comfortable  in   English   only.   Therefore,   it   cannot   be  said   that   this   Court   cannot   entertain   the  Writ   Petition   and   that   allowing   the  Petitioner to answer the question paper of  Geology   of   Gujarati   would   result   into  relaxation   of   recruitment   Rules   in   any  manner   whatsoever   and   thereby   decision  relied   by   the   Respondent   in   the   case   of  Page 21 of 34 HC-NIC Page 21 of 34 Created On Fri Jun 09 00:16:32 IST 2017 C/SCA/19454/2016                                                                                                 CAV JUDGMENT Ajay Dogra (Supra) would not be relevant at  all.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 28 - M Sharma - Full Document

State Of J & K & Ors vs Sat Pal on 5 February, 2013

41.3   The   appointments   of   these   candidates shall be treated to be   notional from 06.05.2011 and they   shall   be   entitled   to   all   consequential   benefits,   except   arrears   of   pay.   (vide   the   decision   of   the  Supreme   Court   of  India   in   the   case   of   State   of  Jammu   and   Kashmir   Vs.   Sat   Pal   reported   in   (2013)   11   SCC   737).
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 44 - J S Khehar - Full Document
1   2 Next