Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 60 (2.01 seconds)

Delay In Filing The Appeal) Pcit ... vs Anand Kumar Jain (Huf) on 15 February, 2021

Sl.No. 14 to 16:In these cases no incriminating material was found during search and the addition has been made on account of unsecured loan received during the year on the basis of statement recorded u/s 132(4) of the brother of the appellant during search and that no confirmation or statement to confront the same was done during search or assessment proceeding. Reliance is placed upon the decision of Delhi High Court in the case of PCIT vs. Shiv Kumar Agarwal, ITA No 231 of 2022 dated 28.07.2022, PCIT vs. Anand Kumar Jain (2021) 432 ITR 384 dated 12.02.2021, Best Infrastructure India (P.)
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 31 - R S Endlaw - Full Document

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central 3 vs Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd. on 24 April, 2023

After hearing both sides, we are of the view that the issue is squarely covered in favour of the assessees as far as aforesaid assessments are concerned, by order of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pr. CIT vs. Abhisar Buildwell (P) Ltd. (supra). Accordingly, the additions made in the aforesaid assessment orders deserve to be deleted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 85 - M R Shah - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next