Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.26 seconds)

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. vs Sudera Realty Private Limited on 6 September, 2022

20. In the instant case, the suit for eviction was decreed on 4.5.2006 directing the defendant to hand over possession of the suit property with further directions of inquiry into mesne profit under Order XX Rule 12 of CPC. It is a matter of fact that the defendant had challenged the said judgment before the Appellate Bench. Resultantly, the subject matter of the lis had not attained finality. The plaintiff had filed the application for mesne profit during the pendency of the appeal, which is nothing but a continuation of suit. Consequently, the date of decree in the suit for eviction cannot be construed as the cause of action or the date of accrual of right to sue. Even otherwise, under Article 113 of the Limitation Act, the period of limitation is three years from the date the right to sue accrues and the cause of action, in the suit for mesne profit being continuous one , the suit was not barred by limitation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - K Joseph - Full Document

Union Of India & Anr vs M/S Nitdip Text. Processors (P)Ltd.& ... on 3 November, 2011

In Union of India vs. Abrahimuddin & Anr. (2012) 8 SCC 148 the Apex Court has observed that an application for taking additional evidence cannot be filed as a matter of right. The Court can consider such an application with circumspection, provided it is covered under either of the pre-requisite conditions incorporated in the statutory provisions itself.
Supreme Court of India Cites 61 - Cited by 39 - H L Dattu - Full Document
1   2 Next