Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (1.59 seconds)
Manish Kumar Sharma & Ors vs . on 23 April, 2015 cites

Y. Abraham Ajith & Ors vs Inspector Of Police, Chennai & Anr on 17 August, 2004

After looking at the decided cases on the point i.e. Sujata Mukherjee v. Prashant Kumar Mukherjee, State of Bihar v. Deokaran Nenshi, Y. Abraham Ajith v. Inspector of Police and Ramesh v. State of T.N., this Court held that the order of the High Court was unsustainable, and therefore, set it aside. It is not only that in the interest of justice, while setting aside the order of the High Court, this Court aalso directed the transfer of the criminal case pending in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Datia, where the wife was staying with her father to the Court of the Judicial S.B.CR. MISC. PETITION NO.1837/2014 Manish Kumar Sharma & Ors.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 438 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Ramesh And Ors vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 3 March, 2005

After looking at the decided cases on the point i.e. Sujata Mukherjee v. Prashant Kumar Mukherjee, State of Bihar v. Deokaran Nenshi, Y. Abraham Ajith v. Inspector of Police and Ramesh v. State of T.N., this Court held that the order of the High Court was unsustainable, and therefore, set it aside. It is not only that in the interest of justice, while setting aside the order of the High Court, this Court aalso directed the transfer of the criminal case pending in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Datia, where the wife was staying with her father to the Court of the Judicial S.B.CR. MISC. PETITION NO.1837/2014 Manish Kumar Sharma & Ors.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 185 - Full Document

Manish Ratan & Ors vs State Of M.P. & Anr on 1 November, 2006

7. Relying on the judgment of this Court in Manish Ratan case , the learned counsel for the appellants contended that the offence in the present case cannot be considered to be a continuing offence, if any, and must be taken to have been complete at Delhi and no cause of action can be said to have arisen at Ambikapur. As must necessarily be, the application of law and the consequences must vary from case to case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 402 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 Next