Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.83 seconds)National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017
42.The Tribunal has also not awarded any amounts towards future
prospects. Since the deceased Shankar was aged about 28 years at the time
of the accident, as per the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in
National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and Others,
(2017) 16 SCC 680, 40% future prospects is to be added to the aforesaid
notional income of Rs.10,000/- per month to arrive at a just compensation.
The compensation awarded under the other heads stands confirmed.
Mohammed Siddique vs National Insurance Company Ltd on 8 January, 2020
23. Dealing with somewhat similar cases, the Hon’ble Supreme
Court recently in Mohammed Siddique and Another Vs. National
Insurance Co. Ltd., 2020 (1) TN MAC 161 (SC) held that in absence of
any evidences to show that the wrongful act on the part of the deceased
victim contributed either to the accident or to the nature of the injuries
sustained, the victim could not have been held guilty of contributory
negligence. There the Hon’ble Supreme Court set aside the finding of the
Tribunal and the High Court and held that 10% contributory negligence
cannot be justified.
Sanjay Verma vs Haryana Roadways on 29 January, 2014
** As per the decision of the in Sanjay Verma Vs. Haryana
Roadways, (2014) 3 SCC 210 and V.Mekala Vs. Malathi
and Another, (2014) 11 SCC 178.
V. Mekala vs M. Malathi & Anr on 25 April, 2014
** As per the decision of the in Sanjay Verma Vs. Haryana
Roadways, (2014) 3 SCC 210 and V.Mekala Vs. Malathi
and Another, (2014) 11 SCC 178.