Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)
Arup Kumar Das And 5 Ors vs The Union Of India And 6 Ors on 16 May, 2019 cites

Central Inland Water ... vs Brojo Nath Ganguly & Anr on 6 April, 1986

13) Thus, the ratio laid down in the cases of (i) Brojo Nath Ganguli (supra), (ii) Usha Rani Goswami (supra), (iii) J.S. Yadav (supra), and (iv) Tushar Ranjan Mohanty (supra) has no application in this case because as per the ratio laid down in the case of (a) A.K. Bindal (supra), and (b) Officers & Supervisors of I.D.P.L. (supra) , the petitioners cannot be held to be Government employees and therefore, the notification of VRS cannot be said to have curtailed any right accrued or vested upon the petitioners.
Supreme Court of India Cites 111 - Cited by 1191 - D P Madon - Full Document

A.K. Bindal & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 25 April, 2003

13) Thus, the ratio laid down in the cases of (i) Brojo Nath Ganguli (supra), (ii) Usha Rani Goswami (supra), (iii) J.S. Yadav (supra), and (iv) Tushar Ranjan Mohanty (supra) has no application in this case because as per the ratio laid down in the case of (a) A.K. Bindal (supra), and (b) Officers & Supervisors of I.D.P.L. (supra) , the petitioners cannot be held to be Government employees and therefore, the notification of VRS cannot be said to have curtailed any right accrued or vested upon the petitioners.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 257 - G P Mathur - Full Document

Officers And Supervisors Of I.D.P.L vs Chairman And M.D. I.D.P.L. And Ors on 24 July, 2003

13) Thus, the ratio laid down in the cases of (i) Brojo Nath Ganguli (supra), (ii) Usha Rani Goswami (supra), (iii) J.S. Yadav (supra), and (iv) Tushar Ranjan Mohanty (supra) has no application in this case because as per the ratio laid down in the case of (a) A.K. Bindal (supra), and (b) Officers & Supervisors of I.D.P.L. (supra) , the petitioners cannot be held to be Government employees and therefore, the notification of VRS cannot be said to have curtailed any right accrued or vested upon the petitioners.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 57 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document

Smti Usha Rani Goswami And Others vs The State Of Assam And Others on 10 March, 2011

13) Thus, the ratio laid down in the cases of (i) Brojo Nath Ganguli (supra), (ii) Usha Rani Goswami (supra), (iii) J.S. Yadav (supra), and (iv) Tushar Ranjan Mohanty (supra) has no application in this case because as per the ratio laid down in the case of (a) A.K. Bindal (supra), and (b) Officers & Supervisors of I.D.P.L. (supra) , the petitioners cannot be held to be Government employees and therefore, the notification of VRS cannot be said to have curtailed any right accrued or vested upon the petitioners.
Gauhati High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 5 - H Roy - Full Document
1