Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.25 seconds)Section 114 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
The Limitation Act, 1963
Article 113 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 101 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 103 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Gopal, Krishnaji Ketkar vs Mahomed Haji Latif & Ors on 19 April, 1968
27. Therefore, learned counsel for the plaintiff has
relied on a decision reported in AIR 1968 Supreme Court
1413, in the case of Gopal Krishnaji Ketkar v. Mohamed
Haji Lathif and others, wherein their lordships have held
as under:-
Indian Companies Act, 1913
Punjab State Civil Supplies Corp. Ltd vs Sikander Singh on 24 February, 2006
29. The learned counsel for the defendant has relied
on a decision reported in AIR 2006 Supreme Court 1438,
in the case of Punjab State Civil Supplies Corp. Ltd., v.
54 O.S.No.486/2008
Sikander Singh, wherein in para 34 of the judgment, their
lordships have observed that
"Negligence in the performance of a duty under
a contract of employment may give rise to a
disciplinary proceeding but as at present
advised, in a case of this nature, we are of the
opinion that same would not give rise to a
cause of action for recovery of money for the
goods lost as in the disciplinary proceeding
itself recovery of money from the delinquent
can be directed by way of punishment".