Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.24 seconds)

Sunil Batra Etc vs Delhi Administration And Ors. Etc on 30 August, 1978

that a criminal should be punished and the punishment prescribed must be meted out to him, but also reforms the criminal through various processes, the most fundamental of which is that in spite of having committed a crime, may be a heinous crime, he should be treated as a human being entitled to all the basic human rights, human dignity and human of sympathy. It was under this theory that this Court in a stream of decisions, projected the need for prison reforms, the need to acknowledge the vital fact that the prisoner, after being lodged rt in jail, does not lose his fundamental rights or basic human rights and that he must be treated with compassion and sympathy (See : Sunil Batra (I) v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1978 SC 1675 : (1978) 4 SCC 494 : 1979 (1) SCR 392 : (1978 Cri LJ 1741); Sunil Batra (II) v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1980 SC 1579 : (1980) 3 SCC 488 : 1980 (2) SCR 557 : (1980 Cri LJ 1099); Charles Sobraj v. Superintendent, Central Jail, Tihar, AIR 1978 SC 1514 : (1978 Cri LJ 1534) and Francis Coralie Mullin v. The Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi, (1981) 1 SCC 608 : AIR 1981 SC 746 : 1981 (2) SCR 516 : (1981 Cri LJ 306) etc.).
Supreme Court of India Cites 55 - Cited by 442 - V R Iyer - Full Document

Karamjit Singh vs State (Delhi Admn.) on 24 April, 2000

14. Their Lordships of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Karamjit Singh v. State (Delhi Admn.) reported in AIR 2000 SC 3467, have held that punishment in criminal cases is both, punitive and reformative. The purpose is that the person found guilty of committing the offence is made to realise his fault and is deterred from repeating such acts in future. The reformative aspect is meant to enable the person concerned to relent and repent for his action and make himself acceptable to the society as a useful social being. Within the parameters of law, an attempt has to be made to afford an opportunity to the individual to reform himself and lead life of a normal, useful member of society and make his contribution to in that regard . denying such opportunity ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 19:15:31 :::HCHP 13 to a person who has been found to have committed offence in the facts and circumstances placed on record would only have a hardening attitude towards his fellow beings and towards society .
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 147 - Full Document
1   2 Next