Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)
Dinesh Kumar Revari Son Of Shri Luxman ... vs The State Of Rajasthan on 12 December, 2024 cites

Chattar Singh & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 24 September, 1996

23. Thence, it can be deduced that the said recruitment was conducted in an unbiased, transparent and fair manners, duly complying with the conditions as spelled out in the advertisement dated 03.08.2023 and taking specific note of the geographical and structural warrants of the state of Rajasthan; that the said number of vacancies i.e. 3578 were sub-categorized and bifurcated on the basis of Districts and Units; that the respondents upon due consideration of the number of applications received and merit scored by the candidates have issued the admit cards to the eligible candidates; that candidates equivalent to fifteen times of advertised posts were called for the PST/PET in the respective categories of petitioner nos. 1 to 7 and 11 to 13 (In SBCWP No. 39/2024), nevertheless, the petitioners could not secure the required cut-off to be called for PST/PET and therefore were not called; that the in the instant recruitment process, not only fifteen times but under the category of NTSP area and TSP area 505036 (Downloaded on 21/12/2024 at 12:26:14 AM) [2024:RJ-JP:49253] (24 of 24) [CW-20250/2023] and 82771 candidates have appeared against 2772 and 232 posts, which shows that 182 times and 356 times candidates have appeared, the same reflects the large scope, bonafide participation and consideration of the candidates; that the interpretation of Rule 6 of the Rules of 2022, advertisement's condition Nos. 3(1) and 10 and judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court, the calculation of fifteen times of the candidates under respective categories at the initial level is embedded and permissible; that the respondent-recruitment agencies have complied with the said provisions and have followed the ratio encapsulated in Chattar Singh & Ors. (supra); that only in exceptional districts and categories like Ex-serviceman or where the candidates have applied disproportional or have not secured minimum standard marks, the recruitment agency chose not to relax the minimum cut-off marks, albeit act in consonance with the provisions of Rule 6 of the Rules of 2022; that considering the precedent enunciated in Manjusree (Supra) it in unambiguous that the Rules of the games cannot be changed once the recruitment has commenced, therefore, no palpable error is determined in the act of the respondents.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 79 - Full Document

Tej Prakash Pathak & Ors vs Rajasthan High Court & Ors on 20 March, 2013

[2024:RJ-JP:49253] (23 of 24) [CW-20250/2023] (Emphasis laid) 22.7 Further, reliance can be placed upon the ratio passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 2634/2013 titled as Tej Prakash & Ors. vs. the Rajasthan High Court & Ors. and Manjusree v. State of Andhra Pradesh and another reported in (2008) 3 SCC 512; wherein it is categorically opined that the rules of the games cannot be changed once the concerned examination/ recruitment process has already commenced.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 150 - Full Document

K.Manjusree Etc vs State Of A.P & Anr on 15 February, 2008

23. Thence, it can be deduced that the said recruitment was conducted in an unbiased, transparent and fair manners, duly complying with the conditions as spelled out in the advertisement dated 03.08.2023 and taking specific note of the geographical and structural warrants of the state of Rajasthan; that the said number of vacancies i.e. 3578 were sub-categorized and bifurcated on the basis of Districts and Units; that the respondents upon due consideration of the number of applications received and merit scored by the candidates have issued the admit cards to the eligible candidates; that candidates equivalent to fifteen times of advertised posts were called for the PST/PET in the respective categories of petitioner nos. 1 to 7 and 11 to 13 (In SBCWP No. 39/2024), nevertheless, the petitioners could not secure the required cut-off to be called for PST/PET and therefore were not called; that the in the instant recruitment process, not only fifteen times but under the category of NTSP area and TSP area 505036 (Downloaded on 21/12/2024 at 12:26:14 AM) [2024:RJ-JP:49253] (24 of 24) [CW-20250/2023] and 82771 candidates have appeared against 2772 and 232 posts, which shows that 182 times and 356 times candidates have appeared, the same reflects the large scope, bonafide participation and consideration of the candidates; that the interpretation of Rule 6 of the Rules of 2022, advertisement's condition Nos. 3(1) and 10 and judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court, the calculation of fifteen times of the candidates under respective categories at the initial level is embedded and permissible; that the respondent-recruitment agencies have complied with the said provisions and have followed the ratio encapsulated in Chattar Singh & Ors. (supra); that only in exceptional districts and categories like Ex-serviceman or where the candidates have applied disproportional or have not secured minimum standard marks, the recruitment agency chose not to relax the minimum cut-off marks, albeit act in consonance with the provisions of Rule 6 of the Rules of 2022; that considering the precedent enunciated in Manjusree (Supra) it in unambiguous that the Rules of the games cannot be changed once the recruitment has commenced, therefore, no palpable error is determined in the act of the respondents.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 638 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1