Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.23 seconds)

Facit Asia Limited vs Collector Of Central Excise on 21 February, 1994

2. The Ld. Counsel Shri J.C. Patel submits that the issue in these appeals is relating to availing of Modvat credit by the manufacturer who has sent out the input material to job work under Rule 57F(2) of Central Excise Rules where the job worker has returned the processed material to the main manufacturer after paying duty on the same. He submitted that the matter now stands settled by the decision of the Southern Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Facit Asia v. Collector . In that case the Tribunal addressed itself to the issue where in case the job worker pays the duty whether in such a situation should the manufacturer assessee be held to be falling outside the purview of Rule 57F(2). The Tribunal held that:
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Tamil Nadu Cites 2 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Collector Of C. Ex. vs Associated Flexibles And Wires P. Ltd. on 18 March, 1994

The Tribunal further held so far as the manufacturer appellants are concerned they have gone through the necessary drill as prescribed under Rule 57F(2) in regard to sending the goods to the job worker and get the same back from the job worker. Payment of duty on the intermediate goods at the hands of the job worker does not in any way, observed the Tribunal, make any difference in law so far as the facility provided under Rule 57F(2) is concerned. This decision of the Tribunal had been referred to with approval by the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in Special Civil Application 72222/'91 and there are further decisions of the Tribunal in the case of Bright Steel Mac Fabrics v. Collector ; and Collector v. Konark Wires (P) Ltd. 1995 (77) ELT 315 : 1995 (58) ECR 133 (T) where the Tribunal decision in Facit Asia as approved by Gujarat High Court had been followed.
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1