Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 30 (0.30 seconds)Section 115 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 115 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 52 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
The Specific Relief Act, 1963
Kafiladdin And Ors. vs Samiraddin And Ors. on 24 February, 1930
From the aforesaid it is evident as was held in Kafilladdin's case (supra) that unless both the contracting party and the subsequent purchaser join in the conveyance it is possible that subsequent difficulties may arise with regard to the plaintiff's title, that is why in Durga Prasad (supra) the Supreme Court held that the proper form of decree is to direct the specific performance of contract between the vendor and the plaintiff and direct the subsequent person to join in the conveyance so as to pass on the title which resides in him to the plaintiff. He does not join in any special covenants made between the plaintiff and his vendor; All he does is to pass on his title to the plaintiff.
Section 146 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Lala Durga Prasad And Another vs Lala Deep Chand And Others on 18 November, 1953
From the aforesaid it is evident as was held in Kafilladdin's case (supra) that unless both the contracting party and the subsequent purchaser join in the conveyance it is possible that subsequent difficulties may arise with regard to the plaintiff's title, that is why in Durga Prasad (supra) the Supreme Court held that the proper form of decree is to direct the specific performance of contract between the vendor and the plaintiff and direct the subsequent person to join in the conveyance so as to pass on the title which resides in him to the plaintiff. He does not join in any special covenants made between the plaintiff and his vendor; All he does is to pass on his title to the plaintiff.
Ramesh Hiranand Kundanmal vs Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... on 4 March, 1992
The court may also refer to another decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ramesh Hirachand Kundanmal v. Municipal Corpn. of Greater Bombay (1992) 2 SCC 524, which has also been considered in the case of Thomson Press India ltd., wherein it has been held as under ...