Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.22 seconds)Section 81 in The Indian Trusts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 82 in The Indian Trusts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 92 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 281A in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 66 in The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 94 in The Indian Trusts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Meenakshi Mills, Madurai vs The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Madras on 26 September, 1956
In support of his contention that the Benami Transaction and the transaction which is sham and nominal are two different concepts, the learned Counsel for the 1st defendant relied upon a decision in the case of Sri Meenakshi Mills v. C.I.T. Madras (1957) I M.L.J. 1 (SC).
Bhim Singh & Anr vs Kan Singh(And Vice Versa) on 21 December, 1979
In this context, the learned Counsel also relied upon a decision reported in Bhim Singh v. Kan Singh , wherein it was held as under: