Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.16 seconds)Real Estate (Regulation And Development) Act, 2016
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Bangalore Development Authority vs Syndicate Bank on 17 May, 2007
7. The opposite party raised plea that due to interim order of High Court, delivery of possession and external development work was delayed by the authorities, as such, development work was delayed. But in the representations, the opposite party admitted that possession over 269844.21 sq. metres land was handed over and development work was carried on over it but due to dispute relating to deposit of lease premium, "occupation certificate" was delayed and issued on 28.02.2020. Even thereafter possession was not offered. Supreme Court in Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Syndicate Bank, (2007) 6 SCC 711, Fortune Infrastructure Vs. Trevor D' Lima, (2018) 5 SCC 442, Kolkata West International City Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Devasis Rudra, 2019 SCC OnLine SC 438, Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. Givindan Raghavan, (2019) 5 SCC 725 and NBCC (India) Ltd. Shri Ram Trivedi, (2021) 5 SCC 273, has held that the buyer cannot made to wait for indefinite period for possession.
M/S. Fortune Infrastructure (Now Known ... vs Trevor Dlima on 12 March, 2018
7. The opposite party raised plea that due to interim order of High Court, delivery of possession and external development work was delayed by the authorities, as such, development work was delayed. But in the representations, the opposite party admitted that possession over 269844.21 sq. metres land was handed over and development work was carried on over it but due to dispute relating to deposit of lease premium, "occupation certificate" was delayed and issued on 28.02.2020. Even thereafter possession was not offered. Supreme Court in Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Syndicate Bank, (2007) 6 SCC 711, Fortune Infrastructure Vs. Trevor D' Lima, (2018) 5 SCC 442, Kolkata West International City Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Devasis Rudra, 2019 SCC OnLine SC 438, Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. Givindan Raghavan, (2019) 5 SCC 725 and NBCC (India) Ltd. Shri Ram Trivedi, (2021) 5 SCC 273, has held that the buyer cannot made to wait for indefinite period for possession.
Kolkata West International City Pvt Ltd vs Devasis Rudra on 25 March, 2019
7. The opposite party raised plea that due to interim order of High Court, delivery of possession and external development work was delayed by the authorities, as such, development work was delayed. But in the representations, the opposite party admitted that possession over 269844.21 sq. metres land was handed over and development work was carried on over it but due to dispute relating to deposit of lease premium, "occupation certificate" was delayed and issued on 28.02.2020. Even thereafter possession was not offered. Supreme Court in Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Syndicate Bank, (2007) 6 SCC 711, Fortune Infrastructure Vs. Trevor D' Lima, (2018) 5 SCC 442, Kolkata West International City Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Devasis Rudra, 2019 SCC OnLine SC 438, Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. Givindan Raghavan, (2019) 5 SCC 725 and NBCC (India) Ltd. Shri Ram Trivedi, (2021) 5 SCC 273, has held that the buyer cannot made to wait for indefinite period for possession.
1