Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.58 seconds)
Applicants vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others on 4 October, 2018 cites

B.S. Joshi & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 13 March, 2003

8. Apart from the said decision, reliance was also placed on another decision of this Court in the case of B.S. Joshi and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Anr (2003) 4 SCC 675 wherein while dealing with the proceedings under Sections 498A and 406 Indian Penal Code involving matrimonial disputes and offences, this Court held that even though the provisions of Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure would not apply to such offences, which are not compoundable it did not limit or affect the powers under Section 482 and the powers conferred on the High Courts and the Supreme Court under Articles 226 and 136 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 11910 - H K Sema - Full Document

Central Bureau Of Investigation, ... vs Duncans Agro Industries Ltd.,Calcutta on 9 July, 1996

9. After considering the said decision in the light of the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties, the High Court took the view that in the Duncans Agro case (supra) this Court was considering the situation involving Section 420 IPC which was compoundable under Section 320(2) CrPC, while in the instant case, the charge sheet was also under Sections 467, 468, 471-A IPC along with the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, which were non- compoundable. The High Court, therefore, held that neither of the said two cases would have application to the facts of this case and rejected the appellant's prayer for discharge from the criminal cases."
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 542 - G N Ray - Full Document
1   2 3 Next