Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 30 (0.28 seconds)Section 1 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
K.C. Sareen vs C.B.I., Chandigarh on 2 August, 2001
No doubt, in the
aforesaid judgment, Hon'ble Apex Court has held that when a public servant
was found guilty of corruption after a judicial adjudicatory process conducted
by a court of law, judiciousness demands that he should be treated as corrupt
until he is exonerated by a superior court but, after passing of judgment in
K.C. Sareen (supra), Hon'ble Apex Court has rendered a number of
judgments, wherein it has been held that judgment of conviction can be
stayed in "exceptional" cases.
Rama Narang vs Ramesh Narang on 19 January, 2021
Navjot Singh Sidhu vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 23 January, 2007
11 In Navjot Singh Sidhu v State of Punjab 6 a Bench of two
learned judges of this Court held that a stay of the order of
conviction by an appellate court is an exception, to be resorted to
::: Downloaded on - 20/10/2022 20:03:53 :::CIS
10
in a rare case, after the attention of the appellate court is drawn to
the consequences which may ensue if the conviction is not stayed.
The court held:
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Ravikant S. Patil vs Sarvabhouma S. Bagali on 14 November, 2006
12 The above position was reiterated by a Bench of three judges of
this Court in Ravikant S Patil v Sarvabhouma S Bagali 7 , after
adverting to the earlier decisions on the issue, viz.