Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.19 seconds)
Mudasir Ahmad Malik vs State Of J&K; And Others on 3 April, 2018 cites

Anant Sakharam Raut & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr. Etc on 14 November, 1986

3) Non-mention about the grant of bail is serious lapse which in turn gives rise to the inference that there is non-application of mind. Similar situation has been dealt with by the Apex Court. It is quite relevant to quote following portion from para 8 of the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of "Anant Sakharam Raut v. State of Maharashtra and another"
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 149 - V Khalid - Full Document

Sophia Gulam Mohd. Bham vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 13 August, 1999

5) The submission appears to have substance. The respondents despite repeated opportunities have not produced the detention records so as show as to whether the material forming base for the grounds of detention has been supplied to the detenue or that the grounds of detention have been read over HCP No.396/2017 Page 2 of 5 to the detenu in Kashmiri language so as to enable him to make a purposeful representation to show his innocence, thereby deprived him of the right guaranteed under Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the judgment rendered in the case of "Sophia Gulam Mohd. Bham v. State of Maharashtra & ors" (AIR 1999 SC 3051), has held as under
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 618 - S S Ahmad - Full Document
1