Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.33 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of U.P. Thru.Prin. Secy Nagar ... vs Kamesh Srivastava & Others on 9 November, 2020
As this appeal arises out of impugned judgement and order dated 24.10.2019 passed by Sessions Judge, Hapur in Session Trial No. 167 of 2016 (State vs. Kamesh), arising out of Case Crime no. 158 of 2015, under Sections 302/34 IPC, P.S. Bahadurgarh, District Hapur, convicting the appellant under Section 302/34 IPC and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 50,000/-; the bail application of the appellant is being disposed of by this order.
Saudan Singh And Anr. vs State Of U.P. on 5 May, 2015
It is submitted that it will be matter of final adjudication in the appeal. There is no eye witness of the incident to support the prosecution version except sweeping observations made in the statement of PW-1 that there was money dispute in between Amit and accused persons. No other evidence has come on record with regard to any such dispute. Learned counsel lastly argued that considering the long custody of the appellants i.e. more than 08 years and appeal being related to the year 2019, which is not likely to be listed for final disposal in near future and the appellant having no criminal antecedents to his credit as well as in the light of the judgement passed by Supreme Court in the case of Saudan Singh vs. State of U.P. in Criminal Appeal No. 308/2022 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4633 of 2021, he is entitled to be released on bail.
Section 25 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
1